Rating agency downgrades Conn.'s debt

HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH/AP) — Moody's Investor Service on Friday downgraded Connecticut's debt rating despite efforts by Gov. Dannel P. Malloy to reduce the state's pension costs and balance the budget, saying the state's financial problems continue to stand apart from those of other states.

"The governor has taken a lot of positive steps, but it's going to take a long time to undo the problems they've gotten themselves into," said Moody's analyst Nicole Johnson, referring to the state's high borrowing and retirement expenses. "When we look at all of Connecticut and compare it to its peers, other states, it is an outlier in terms of those fixed costs, and we don't expect those fixed costs to come down significantly over the near term."

Johnson pointed out how Connecticut has no rainy day fund for fiscal emergencies and how the state won't be able to build it up for a few years because it needs to pay off bonds that were issued in past years to cover deficits. Also, she said, Connecticut's state employee retirement plans continue to be seriously underfunded and that the state carries a very high debt load.

Moody's said in its report released Friday that it expects the state's revenue trends to improve as Connecticut emerges from recession. Moody's designated the state's financial outlook as "stable."

[Read Moody's report]

Benjamin Barnes, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy's budget secretary, blasted the rating agency's announcement, saying Moody's "is wrong in its analysis of the state's finances" and wrong to change the state's rating for about $14.6 billion in general obligation bonds from Aa3 to Aa2. He also charged that Moody's was trying to save face following last year's controversy over its downgrading of federal government's debt.

"Connecticut has done all the right things to shore up our finances, and Moody's has responded with a downgrade intended to satisfy their internal corporate need to deflect attention from their historic lack of credibility," Barnes said. "Connecticut has always paid its debt, and remains an attractive issuer of public debt."

[Click here to read Barnes' statement]

Asked about Barnes' charges, Johnson said Moody's "understands that (bond) issuers are not happy when they're downgraded," but that Connecticut currently "looks weak relative to its peers."

A downgrade can lead to higher borrowing costs, and House Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero Jr., R-Norwalk, warned that it could hurt efforts to attract business to the state because it appears Connecticut's finances are not in order.

But state Treasurer Denise Nappier said she doesn't expect an increase in interest costs for future bond issuances because interest rates are at historic lows. Also, she said Moody's has had a negative outlook on the state's credit since last summer and "at least a portion of the rating change is already priced into current interest rate levels on new debt."

“In many ways, Moody’s action is going in the wrong direction, particularly since Connecticut has made tough decisions to bring structural balance to its operating budget and set in motion a clear path to improve financial stability," said Nappier. "Despite these steps forward, this rating agency appears to be judging the State’s credit worthiness through the rearview mirror."

[Read Nappier's full statement here]

The rating change comes the same week that Malloy's administration announced that state revenues are expected to decline by about $95 million in the current fiscal year that ends June 30, or one-half of 1 percent of the annual budget. They are expected to drop by about $139 million the following fiscal year that ends June 30, 2013, or seven-tenths of 1 percent of the annual budget.

Cafero said the revenue drop, the ratings downgrade and Nappier's warning earlier this month that Connecticut had $195 million in cash on hand — about enough to pay for two-and-a-half-days of expenditures — are all warnings the Malloy administration has "pooh-poohed" and denied as warning signals.

He maintains that if Malloy and state lawmakers had cut more spending instead of raising taxes $2.6 billion over two years and secured more realistic savings from state employees, Moody's might have held Connecticut's bond rating steady and acknowledged the state was taking steps in the right direction to address its fiscal problems.

Roy Occhiogrosso, the governor's senior adviser, called Cafero's accusation that Malloy is ignoring budgetary warnings "ridiculous," and said the governor has been warning about the state's budget problems since he was a candidate and has taken steps to eliminate budgetary gimmicks and honestly balance the state's books. Since Malloy took office a year ago, following two consecutive Republican governors, Occhiogrosso said the state has seen important improvements.

"Unemployment is at its lowest point in more than two years, and is headed down. Governor Malloy's first year in office resulted in the state experiencing net job growth for the first time in four years," Occhiogrosso said. "And today, CBIA (the Connecticut Business and Industry Association) suggested the economy could grow by four percent next year."

He said much of that is happening because Malloy and "some very courageous legislators had the guts to do what was necessary to stabilize the state's finances."

Jerry Labriola, chairman of the Connecticut Republicans, said Friday's downgrade shows that Malloy's fiscal policies, backed by the Democratic-controlled General Assembly, are not working.

"We have the highest per capita borrowing of any state in the country. In 2011, we were the only state in the region to actually increase state government spending, and we also led the nation in per capita taxes," he said. "So the governor is fond of blaming prior Republican governors for his budget problems, but this was the governor's budget. He proposed it and the Democrats approved it in lock step. He wanted all those taxes and he approved all that spending."

Copyright 2012 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

 

Political Pulse

Did you like this article? Vote it up or down! And don't forget to add your comments below!

No
Like It
 
100%
Don't Like It
 
 
 

Comments

OverTaxed
Why are the education expenses so high? Does it have anything to do with the unions, the benefits, the health insurance???? My friend who is a teacher has health insurance copays of $5 (primary doctor) and $10 for a specialist!!!! Mine are $30 and $45. There is plenty of fat to cut there. Plus my property taxes are also quite high! I haven't seen a reduction since the value of my home went down. I'm sure they will just raise the millrate. Bottom line...unions are too greedy and they are killing this country. We just can't afford to pay these benefits anymore!!
northlander41
http://advocacy.ccm-ct.org/Resources.ashx?id=7948d7ab-e162-4f7f-ac81-ab869be6d70c The link - for the Democrats who can read ;) - regarding that 64 cents OF EVERY PROPERTY TAX DOLLAR paying for mostly Teachers Union and BOE pensions - what's left over goes to CT public education.
northlander41
Voters aren't stupid and they aren't going to to believe the Democrat nonsense here that tho govt is paying for education it is free - the CT taxpayers pay for it! per TESTIMONY of the CONNECTICUT CONFERENCE OF MUNICIPALITIES to the EDUCATION COMMITTE on March 7, 2011: The cost for public education across the state [Connecticut] for the current school year exceeds $10.4 billion. Municipal property taxpayers already: • Pay about $0.64 of every $1.00 raised in property taxes toward K-12 public education. • Pay for at least 60 percent of Connecticut’s over $1.5 billion in special-education costs. • Pick-up the bill for numerous other state-mandated education priorities that are not fully funded by the State.
northlander41
If you mean making the people who don't pay property taxes to pay for thier childrens education to pay something - yes I'm there. But I'm paying a lot of property taxes to support public education - maybe you all mean that public union state employees also have the benefit of not paying anything towards public education - that I didn't know - make them pay then! Apparantly unlike the rest of you I pay a lot for public eductaion! Too much at $17,000 per child! You all must be renters of living at home I guess.
TheREALDad
Education is the biggest expense we have..PAY FOR YOU OWN DAMN KIDS you mooching LOSERS!! Whats next,,,free college at UCONN??
OverTaxed
Yea..that makes a lot of sense. We all will start paying for our children's highschool education as well as their college. How about the folks that are barely making ends meet now? How about single parents? Will they be excused or maybe their kids won't have to be educated. Come on...come up with a realistic solution. Cut the benefits to be in line with the private sector and our budget will be balanced immediately!
Alex
Sounds like Cope has it right,,you save 17K per chile per year if you STOP paying for them to get a "free" education...Educate them yourself or DONT have them. I paid for my kids educations,I can't understand why people would entrust that job to just anyone like when the city school are in charge of education them. Makes no sense
OverTaxed
The problem is the benefits of state and town employees. Give the state employees the equivalent of a 401k plan and contributions/copays on health insurance and all our fiscal problems will be solved. I personally have 2 relatives who both have not reached 50 years of age and are enjoying state pensions of 45k and 50k each plus they have their health insurance paid for until age 70 for themselves and their spouse. This is ridculous....they should retire at 65 like the rest of us. Until this crap changes you can tax the rest of us to death and it won't make a difference. Those pension deals are like hitting the lottery!!
northlander41
See this PDF to find out how much the Democrats and the Teachers Union are milking you for marginal at best public education in property tax dollars: http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/sde/PDF/dgm/report1/basiccon.pdf Yes, give me back my property tax money and I can send my kids to top notch private schools for half the cost!! These CT Dems are irresponsible - remember when they touted the supposed surplus?? Bet you anything that after election we will find out CT is in much worse shape than the CT Dem Lawmakers ever let on - total disaster by the Dems!
northlander41
I'm so tired of koolaid Democrats - like State Public Union Employees - saying things that are blantantly false - I don't know maybe they live at home with their parents and don't pay property taxes so they don't have a clue. HARTFORD TAXPAYERS PAY $17,000 PER CHILD IN PROPERTY TAXES TO PAY FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION - go to the Dept of Education website and see for yourself!!
 
« Previous | Displaying 1 – 10 of 12 | Next »

Add a Comment

Sign in or join now to post a comment. All comments will display your username and avatar.

 


Connecticut (change)

 
Connecticut has 169 cities and towns, which serve as the fundamental local political subdivision of the state. Connecticut is the 5th of the original thirteen United States.
 
Offices & Officials

Governor: Dan Malloy
Lieutenant Governor: Nancy Wyman
Attorney General: George Jepsen
State Treasurer: Denise L. Nappier

Contacting the White House and Congress

Click the links below to get in touch with your elected officials.